Why is Ubuntu extra safe and secure than Windows or Mac OS X?

Please offer some strong factors.

Connected Question

2019-05-05 04:07:30
Source Share
Answers: 6

A chain is just as solid as its weakest link or a chain is as safe and secure as its unsafest link. The customer is the weakest link, not the OS. Linux - individuals do recognize what a computer system is, do have an idea of computer system - security. Most individuals do not. Provide any kind of computer system, it will certainly be contaminated in a snap, Windows, Mac Os - X, Linux, ...

2019-05-21 10:25:48

To make a common factor ; Mac OS - X is partially open source. The shut resource components are, unsurprisingly, one of the most struck little bits by Mac Virii. Construct from that what you will.

2019-05-21 02:14:25

There has actually been a great deal of discussion over whether a open setting is inherently extra safe and secure than a shut setting. The trouble being that when we contrast the security of Windows with Linux the argument is constantly run out that due to the fact that Windows has such a market dominance, that the opponents target Windows and also if Linux had the very same degree of use after that it would certainly be located equally as at risk.

The bottom line to take below is that it is the mono - society that is actually liable. Among the key benefits of Linux is that there are a myriad of various circulations, while a strike might be manipulated throughout a variety of various circulations hardly ever will it influence all. We can see this from the susceptability records that are reported, because also if an extensively made use of application or collection is located to be at risk that direct exposure is generally restricted as a result of arrangement alternatives to just a couple of circulations. The very same does not appear to relate to the Windows family members as the arrangement of collections and also applications coincide throughout versions.

2019-05-08 17:57:40
  1. Windows has actually had a solitary - customer principles for a long time. Despite having the development of NT and also a role/privilege system, default installs would certainly stick customers as king of capital. Their account (and also, extra notably, anything running as their account) can do anything to any kind of documents without a check.

    This is massive due to the fact that any kind of application, any kind of manipulate in an application can run as Administrator .

    It's just given that Vista where that's attempting to be turned around and also tightened up with points like UAC ...

  2. Source accessibility is a double - bordered sword. Open resource fanatics generally proclaim security yet it does additionally allow individuals right into the system. They do not need to report anything they locate, they can simply write ventures for the opening.

    The good news is, most individuals do report any kind of imperfections they locate. Also far better is they occasionally include spots that can be quickly examined and also dispersed.

    The turn-around for covering security openings does appear much shorter than shut resource software program.

  3. There are simply less people.

    Appears stark yet there are less individuals making use of one certain open resource application. It's tough to warrant creating a manipulate, trojan, worm, etc when you can write one for Windows in the very same time and also capture a whole lot even more individuals.

Yet we can not be obsequious. There's no reason that a trojan or worm can not operate in Linux. A destructive application running as a minimal customer can still do an entire load of damages. And also the actual imperfection in all of this is the customers.

Customers are boneheads that can be encouraged to do virtually anything if you clothe it up with adequate splendor or make it resemble they're going to get something rewarding from the procedure.

Read : Linux isn't invulnerable. Don't say it is. (Disclaimer : my blog post, my blog site)

2019-05-08 06:45:49


  • Windows was made, back then, as a solitary - customer system. Linux, on the various other hand, was constructed with a multi - customer style.

  • In Linux, all your system documents are possessed by origin. They're secured down and also can not be modified by the informal customer. Windows offers free array to the system documents.

  • Windows UAC is the existing execution to limit accessibility to these system documents and also settings, it's a spot to attempt settle a basic layout imperfection. Linux has this security constructed in from scratch, making it extra trusted and also snugly incorporated right into the customer experience.

  • It is Open Source, which suggests the code can be evaluated by any person (primarily programmers). This is Linus' Law, which mentions that "offered sufficient eyeballs, all pests are superficial".

  • A default Linux install is secured down : just crucial solutions start. Windows made use of to have several exploitable solutions running (yet they've tightened up on that front a little bit).

We can not evaluate simply on OS alone, a lot of security imperfections connect to negative customer techniques, social design and also simply simple lack of knowledge. A chain is just as solid as it's weakest link.

Additionally, no matter OS, no system is safe and secure if you have physical accessibility to it ;)

2019-05-08 05:54:39

More safe and secure than Windows :

  1. Privileges

  2. Social Engineering

  3. The Monoculture Effect

  4. Audience Size

  5. Number of "Eyeballs"

For even more description concerning the above factors please refer pcworld.com/why_linux_is_more_secure_than_windows

2019-05-08 05:10:42