Why should I respect areas of favorable particular?
This is what I find out about why a person could respect areas of favorable particular:
 they serve for number concept
 in algebraic geometry, a concept of "geometry" can be created over them, and also it's enjoyable to see just how this geometry exercises
Some individuals might read this and also assume, "What extra could you require?" Yet I've never ever had the ability to make myself respect number concept, so (1) does not aid me. (2) behaves wherefore it is, yet I'm wishing there's something extra. My understanding of (2) is that this is just geometry in an instead abstract feeling and also, as an example, there's no usually valuable means to straight aesthetically stand for these areas or selections over them the means we can over the reals or intricate numbers. (Attracting a contour in R ^ 2 and also claiming it's the contour over a few other area might be handy for some objectives, yet it's not what I'm after below.)
Exists anything else? The excellent (undoubtedly difficult) solution for me would certainly be "Yes, such areas are great versions for these usual and also understandable physical systems: A, B, C. Also, we can envision them and also selections over them fairly conveniently by method D. Finally, below's a number of shocking and also handy applications to 500 various other locations of maths."
UPGRADE: to address Qiaochu's comment concerning what I do respect.
Allow's claim I respect:
algebraic & geometric geography
differential geometry & geography
applications to physics
and also I absolutely respect algebraic geometry over C
(this is to claim I recognize the inspirations behind these topics and also the basic suggestion, not always that I recognize them detailed)
The building and construction of the actual area from the rationals making use of Cauchy series can be resembled to construct various other (particular absolutely no) full areas not isometric to the reals. Particularly, as opposed to starting with the statistics specified by the common (archimedean) outright value, one can take into consideration the $p$  adic statistics ($p$ a set prime) and also continue in the very same lines. A theory of Ostrowski claims that approximately equivalence these remain in reality the only means to finish $\Bbb Q$.
Being full, the areas ${\Bbb Q}_p$ hence gotten can be made use of to create an analytic concept which resembles the timeless concept "over $\Bbb R$" yet has some refined distinctions.
A resource of distinction is that the areas ${\Bbb Q}_p$ have   not likely $\Bbb R$   an allnatural subring, the distance $1$ round focused in $0$, a.k.a. the $p$  adic integers $\Bbb Z_p$, which is a neighborhood ring with deposit area isomorphic to the area with $p$ components.
This is an idea to the reality that "$p$  adic evaluation" is deeply linked with the concept of limited areas.
I do not intend to be mean or discourteous below ; yet my individual idea is that if you do dislike number concept, you are missing out on one of the most vital subject in maths. It is essentially the heart of maths.
If you actually require a concrete instance, I can offer one from the perspective of algebra. To have an instance of a totally non  separable polynomial, you most likely to char p.
Let's intend you respect limited teams, somehow. After that you possibly respect the category of limited straightforward teams. The mass of this category is the teams of Lie type, which were uncovered by locating analogues of Lie teams over limited areas.
Limited areas are additionally (as one could presume) really vital in computer technology. I'm absolutely no specialist, yet below are some applications I recognize of :
 Cryptographic methods like DiffieHellman have as their basis the straightforward reality that it is hard to invert exponentiation in limited areas.
 The typical manner in which one variables polynomials over the integers is to use something like Berlekamp's algorithm to factor them over numerous limited areas first, after that incorporate the factorizations.
 The timeless theory that IP=PSPACE calls for some job over limited areas.
 Elliptic contours over limited areas are made use of for elliptic curve cryptography.
 I have actually additionally been informed that vector rooms and also selections over limited areas can be made use of to construct mistake  dealing with codes. I do not recognize anything concerning this, yet below is a book on the topic. For the grandfather clause of straight codes this brings about an attractive example in between latticework round packagings and also mistake  dealing with codes which is defined, as an example, by Noam Elkies here.
Ultimately, also if you are just curious about selections over $\mathbb{C}$ (say), if your selection takes place to additionally behave and also specified over $\mathbb{Z}$ after that it can be wonderful and also specified over $\mathbb{F}_p$ for almost finitely several $p$ and also you can make use of the Weil conjectures to calculate its Betti numbers by counting . This is specifically simple for selections with wonderful moduli analyses like flag selections.
Modify : You could additionally want reviewing Serre's expository writeup How to use finite fields for problems concerning infinite fields, along with Manin's Reflections on arithmetical physics. I obtained the last link from a superb answer to an MO question on mirror proportion over limited areas.
If you want algebraic geometry over C , below is an additional factor. A standard strategy in birational geometry is the bend and also break, which about totals up to taking any kind of contour on a projective selection and also flawing it till it comes to be a union of contours of lower category. At some point this strategy can be made use of to generate sensible contours (under ideal theory).
This is a significant device, and also has actually been made use of as an example to research the geometry of Fano selections, specifically to confirm that they are uniruled, or to confirm Hartshorne opinion on the characterization of projective room by the positivity of its tangent package.
The reality is, to make the method job you need to have a contour whose room of ingrained contortions allows sufficient. This is very easy to attain in favorable particular : the contour itself might not flaw, yet if you compose the incorporation with a completely high power of the Frobenius morphism, the map that you get will certainly have adequate contortions. To confirm the cause particular 0, a strategy of decrease to particular p is made use of.
There is an entire paper of Serre on this, which I have not read ; I will certainly clarify quickly among my favored applications.
Among the actually trendy applications of this is to the AxGrothendieck theorem. Which is a 100% analytic declaration : if $P: \mathbb{C}^n \to \mathbb{C}^n$ is an injective polynomial map, after that it's surjective. And also yet the evidence makes use of limited areas.
Just how? Well, first note that the theory is unimportant when $\mathbb{C}$ is changed by a limited area : an injective map on limited collections is surjective. Making use of a little algebra (and also a straightforward straight restriction argument), it adheres to that the theory holds true for the algebraically shut area of particular $p$ which is the algebraic closure of the integers mod $p$.
Currently relate to a little version concept ; the theory of Robinson claims that any kind of declaration of first  order reasoning that holds true in an alg. shut area of char. $p$ for each and every $p$ holds true in any kind of algebraically shut area of char 0, specifically the intricate numbers. The method is that the Ax  Grothendieck theory can be phrased as a collection of (definitely several) declarations in first  order reasoning. And also each holds true in the algebraic closure of the limited areas. Whence, by Robinson's theory, it's real in $\mathbb{C}$!
This would certainly be ripping off if Robinson's theory were something rare. Actually, nonetheless, it is a straight application of the compactness theorem for firstorder logic.
For an additional evidence using the Nullstellensatz (yet based upon limited areas, still), see Terry Tao's post.

You can not stay clear of limited areas if you do intricate algebraic geometry, equally as you can not stay clear of (and also it is a benefit to make use of) variables that make even to absolutely no. Some significant strategies function by decrease mod $p$ and also there aren't constantly replaces that complete the very same straight in particular 0.

A great deal of formulas function by lowering modulo several tops and afterwards covering with each other the outcomes (Chinese rest theory). For the evaluation of what at takes place the tops you require to recognize limited areas, and also in many cases, p  adic areas.

Mistake  dealing with codes have a basic value as building and constructions of "evenly dispersed" or "well spaced" things in several measurements. This holds true regardless of their added commercial, cryptographic or computational value. And also it takes place that the understandable component of mistake  dealing with code concept is the component pertaining to straight algebra, number concept, and also algebraic geometry over limited areas. To the level that mistake  dealing with codes are attended be a version for sensations in nature or its mathematical idealizations (crystals, packagings, treatments, rotate glasses, combinatorial stage changes, etc) after that regular use limited areas is inescapable, also if you uncommitted concerning number concept in itself.
Related questions