What means warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno when installing from rpmfusion?
Installing a media gamer from rpmfusion (using
yum) returns adhering to result:
Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 3 Packages (+32 Dependent packages) Total download size: 21 M Installed size: 68 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY Public key for a52dec-0.7.4-16.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not installed (1/35): a52dec-0.7.4-16.fc17.x86_64.rpm | 50 kB (2/35): faad2-libs-2.7-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm | 145 kB
What is that intended to suggest?
I've made it possible for rpmfusion using:
yum localinstall rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm
(downloaded and install the rpm from the rpmfusion website)
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-17-primary (and also symlinks) which has the appropriate key id:
# gpg --with-fingerprint RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-17-primary pub 4096R/8296FA0F [...]
rpm -qa gpg-pubkey* does not present an access for 8296FA0F.
I am not actually certain just how
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg and also
rpmkeys --import and also close friends interact.
And also btw, why is
yum simply releasing a caution and also not a mistake that the key is not readily available?
You are refraining anything incorrect. The plan is inaccurately authorized.
From a string on lists.rpmfusion.org:
Are you knowledgeable about the various other plans that would certainly require to be re - authorized, also? a52dec is simply one instance.
As soon as the altered plan gets to the mirrors, mounting it more than likely will function great (calling for a "yum tidy packages", nonetheless, to remove the plan cache).
While this remained in reference to the Fedora 16 plans, probably - your plan also deals with the very same destiny of a negative signature. Read the hinge on lists.rpmfusion.org.