What means warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno when installing from rpmfusion?

Installing a media gamer from rpmfusion (using yum) returns adhering to result:

Transaction Summary
Install  3 Packages (+32 Dependent packages)

Total download size: 21 M
Installed size: 68 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
                            key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY
Public key for a52dec-0.7.4-16.fc17.x86_64.rpm is not installed
(1/35): a52dec-0.7.4-16.fc17.x86_64.rpm                  |  50 kB
(2/35): faad2-libs-2.7-2.fc17.x86_64.rpm                 | 145 kB

What is that intended to suggest?

I've made it possible for rpmfusion using:

 yum localinstall rpmfusion-free-release-stable.noarch.rpm

(downloaded and install the rpm from the rpmfusion website)

I have /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-17-primary (and also symlinks) which has the appropriate key id:

# gpg --with-fingerprint RPM-GPG-KEY-rpmfusion-free-fedora-17-primary
pub  4096R/8296FA0F  [...]

But rpm -qa gpg-pubkey* does not present an access for 8296FA0F.

I am not actually certain just how /etc/pki/rpm-gpg and also rpmkeys --import and also close friends interact.

And also btw, why is yum simply releasing a caution and also not a mistake that the key is not readily available?

2022-06-07 14:41:40
Source Share
Answers: 1

You are refraining anything incorrect. The plan is inaccurately authorized.

From a string on lists.rpmfusion.org:

Are you knowledgeable about the various other plans that would certainly require to be re - authorized, also? a52dec is simply one instance.

As soon as the altered plan gets to the mirrors, mounting it more than likely will function great (calling for a "yum tidy packages", nonetheless, to remove the plan cache).

While this remained in reference to the Fedora 16 plans, probably - your plan also deals with the very same destiny of a negative signature. Read the hinge on lists.rpmfusion.org.

2022-06-07 15:10:46