apt - build & Chromium PPA
I would certainly such as to build an (maximized) Version of Chromium for my equipment with apt - improve Ubuntu 10.04. I've included a Chromium - PPA to my/ etc/sources. list.d/ similar to this:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/chromium-daily/stable/ubuntu lucid main deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/chromium-daily/stable/ubuntulucid main
But if I run
sudo apt-build install chromium browser
It informs me
chromium - internet browser will certainly not be constructed due to the fact that it does not have a resource plan. Missing out on resource plan name for source_by_source ().
On the various other hand sudo apt - get resource chromium - internet browser
appears to function great, also downloads the 6.x from the PPA
What am I doing incorrect? Structure ffmpeg and also firefox using apt - build functioned like a wind. Other than that my recommended chromium is from a PPA I do not see a distinction.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:chromium-daily/stable && sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install chromium-browser
As for your sources.list.d documents offer a room besides ubuntu and also lucid similar to this "/ ubuntu lucid major" if the very same remains in your resource and also its not a typo:)
Yes, the line with the "ubuntulucid" is a typo, the initial has actually those 2 seperated.
@sagarchalise : Thats specifically just how I mounted Chromium which does job. Nonetheless, I would love to have it build by apt - build as opposed to mounting the binary variation with apt - get. So it doen't benefit me. Including the database once more really did not benefit me either.
Solved! Feels like apt - build demands all deborah - src databases it need to make use of inside / etc/apt/sources. checklist . By including the PPA using apt - add - database a different apply for each new repository obtains developed (inside/ etc/apt/sources. list.d). So placing both line straight right into / etc/sources. checklist and also running
sudo apt - build upgrade & & sudo apt - build - - reinstall install chromium - internet browser
dealt with the concern for me. Many thanks for your suggestions however!
This bugreport on launchpad appears relevant.