# Just how did the notation "ln" for "log base e" come to be so prevalent?

Wikipedia sez:

The all-natural logarithm of $x$ is usually created "$\ln(x)$", as opposed to $\log_e(x)$ specifically in techniques where it isn't created "$\log(x)$". Nonetheless, some mathematicians this notation. In his 1985 memoir, Paul Halmos slammed what he took into consideration the "childlike $\ln$ notation," which he claimed no mathematician had actually ever before made use of. Actually, the notation was designed by a mathematician, Irving Stringham, teacher of maths at University of California, Berkeley, in 1893.

Evidently the notation "$\ln$" first shows up in Stringham's publication *Uniplanar algebra: being component I of a propædeutic to the greater mathematical evaluation*.

Yet this does not clarify why "$\ln$" has actually come to be so prevalent. I'm rather certain that the majority of senior high schools in the United States at the very least still make use of the notation "$\ln$" today, given that every one of the calculus pupils I enter into call with at Berkeley appear to globally make use of "$\ln$".

Just how did this take place?

One straightforward feasible factor

It is really hard ahead up with a notation that is succinct, proper and also easy to understand by at the very least 2 individuals. - P A M Dirac/ Richard Feynmann

This one is succinct, proper and also is easy to understand at the very least by you and also me!

Usually, symbols made use of in preferred books spread out like infection. Publications come to be preferred as a result of excellent notation and also notation comes to be prevalent due to the fact that publication is preferred.

It is possibly at the very least partly an instance of customer lock - in, the sensation where the benefits of most of the marketplace making use of the very same or suitable items surpass completely small distinctions of one variation of the item versus an additional. (When I discovered this term, the approved instance was VHS versus Beta. I am nearly old adequate to bear in mind that when VCR terms first appeared, suppliers would certainly lug both. Currently when the first video shops opened there was extra item readily available in VHS, so a great deal of shops would certainly have simply one shelf with all the Beta items. And also at some point certainly Beta passed away. Nonetheless those that bear in mind and also care appear to greatly concur that Beta was the premium modern technology. Apologies for offering such an old - fogey instance. Can a person recommend something extra existing?)

Specifically, when it involves digital calculators, having every person concur what's mosting likely to take place when you push a particular switch is a good idea. (In reality, an additional lock - in sensation is that when I remained in senior high school in the very early 90's, the majority of pupils had Texas Instruments calculators of one kind or various other. Amongst the actual nerds it was recognized that the "cadillac of calculators" was in fact the Hewlett - Packard, which made use of reverse polish notation. Significant CS individuals value RPN, yet the trouble is that if you're a senior high school child and also grab such a calculator for the very first time, it's really tough to identify what's taking place. I have not seen an HP calculator for years.) The notation $\ln$ is straightforward and also distinct : you do not need to like it (and also I do not, specifically), yet you recognize what it suggests, and also it's less complicated to fit on a tiny calculator key than $\log_e$. I assume if you're first learning more about logarithms, after that base 10 is possibly the most basic (to have any kind of idea what $e$ is apart from "concerning $2.71828...$" calls for some calculus, and also remains in my experience among the extra refined principles of first year calculus), so it's practical to have that be the typical base for the logarithm for a basic target market.

Additionally, I'm certain every person below recognizes this yet I desire my calculus pupils had a far better admiration of it : specifically what base you consider the logarithm just matters approximately a multiplicative constant anyhow, given that $\log_c x = \frac{\log_a x}{\log_a c}$. So it's immaterial regardless.

I do not have adequate rep. on this website to upload a talk about Gerard's solution, so I'll write this as a solution. Those that claim "tan" is extra usual than tg needs to remember where they live. In Russian the typical acronym is tg, not tan. They write wrong and also cos, yet the trig operates tan, cot, and also csc have alternative acronyms. See the first line at http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Тригонометрические_функции, as an example, where the trigonometric features are called and afterwards abbreviated in parentheses.

The `log`

acronym was extra easy to understand after that the `lg`

acronym, as well as additionally was extra all-natural contrasted to the `sin`

, `cos`

, `tan`

acronyms. Contrast the `tg`

notation versus `tan`

. They are both in operation, nonetheless `tan`

is extra usual.

When it comes to `log_a(x)`

we have 2 vital grandfather clauses : `log_10`

and also `log_e`

. `Log_10`

was so usual, specifically in senior high school, that it came to be shortened to `log`

.

`Log_e`

is/was harder to recognize at senior high school degree - I can bear in mind that. The notation `ln`

to identify this grandfather clause is handy specifically for newbies. 2 various set of regulations for 2 various circumstances (`log=log_10`

and also `ln=log_e`

). Later the can *probably * recognize the basic instance.

To include in the complication : my educators at the college made use of the notation `log`

to suggest `ln`

!! From there perspective any kind of added notation need to be stayed clear of and also `log_10`

had no certain relevance to them.

So the `ln`

notation becomes valuable from a didactical viewpoint.

Cajori, in his *History of mathematical symbols *, Vol. II, regarding I can see, states the notation "$\operatorname{ln}$" as soon as when he is speaking about symbols for logarithm. He describes [Irving Stringham, *Uniplanar Algebra *, (San Francisco 1893), p. xiii ] as a person that made use of that notation ; the means this individual is stated makes me question he was the first or alone in this, though (I would certainly enjoy to recognize what 'uniplanar algebra' is (was?)!)

The reference of "$\operatorname{ln}$" is fairly small, and also I would certainly presume that at the time Cajori was creating (the quantity was finished in August 1925) the notation was basically not made use of, for or else he would certainly have been extra curious about it.

**PS : ** I assume I obtained the link from a person below, or on MO. http://spikedmath.com/043.html is rather pertinent!

I recommend that everyone from currently on usages ln, lg, and also pound specifically for the all-natural, decimal, and also binary logarithmic features, booking log for when the base is presented clearly or is some set approximate number if the range does not matter. I do (with description if essential at the first instance ). What could be less complex?

This convention is the ISO standard (given that 1992 ); see Wikipedia.

Related questions