Is it negative to defrag a minimally fragmented drive?

A person informed me that it is not constantly an excellent suggestion to defragment a minimally fragmented drive ( < 2% ); which it can create performance concerns.

Are they right, and also why/why not?

0
2019-05-07 12:56:05
Source Share
Answers: 3

As Adam claimed, the only performance concern brought on by defragging a virtually - unfragmented drive is the moment it requires to run the defrag. Yet note that the much less fragmented a drive is, the quicker the defrag will certainly run.

0
2019-05-09 08:07:19
Source

No, if you intend to invest the moment doing that it's great. Usually you will not get a lot for the time you invest doing it, however.

Remember that the 2% statistics, nonetheless, does not inform you anything. Does that mean that just 2% of documents are fragmented, or that 2% of the drive room has documents pieces, or another thing?

For sure metrics a 2% fragmented drive could in fact be reducing you down dramatically relying on your use pattern.

Still, most of the times the moment it requires to defragment it is significantly longer than the moment you'll conserve as soon as it's defragmented.

0
2019-05-09 07:15:18
Source

is tolerable, per say, is simply primarily pointless to do so

0
2019-05-08 03:42:44
Source