Lightest means to run GUI applications in Linux?
I understood I can make use of a window manager without a desktop environment and also do not shed any kind of capability I respect. Applications still function great, I can still prepare application home windows as I please.
This virtually removes the demand for lightweight desktop computer settings such as LXDE and also XFCE for usage instances like mine.
I ask yourself if that is completion of the checklist. Exists anything one can perhaps remove? As the minimum, I desire something that can run GUI applications like Firefox. I visualize something with an incurable where I can start various other applications.
Personally, I will certainly favor to make use of the "Xvesa" as opposed to any kind of Desktop Environments.
Xvesa is solid sufficient to run the firefox and also sort - of - application.
[ Xvesa is made use of by tinycore, the tiniest and also minimalistic Linux OS ]
I occasionally read just how to start an application straight with X11, as an example: inform X11, that the Desktop Environment/Window Manager/the application to work on start-up is firefox/is gimp/is another thing.
Kiosk mode. You can not switch over from application to application - simply make use of a solitary. application.
You do not require X11 to have a window manager. You can make use of TWIN, the Text - setting window manager, in addition to GPM for computer mouse. You could need to change your key internet browser to Links and also your conversation program to Finch, however.
The OpenBSD execution of cwm, is an outstanding equilibrium in between lightweight and also attribute abundant. By default, just an xterm shows up when you login. There are no decors around the windows, and also absolutely nothing on the desktop. Every little thing is done using key-board (and also, yes, I suggest every little thing). If you intend to ssh someplace
Alt+. will certainly bring up an ssh dialog. If you intend to execute a program
Shift+Alt+/ will certainly raise a director dialog.
Complete checklist of features/commands is readily available as a man page.
However, this is just readily available on OpenBSD regarding I can inform. Though the resource can be assembled and also worked on linux, which is what I do when I'm not permitted to make use of OpenBSD.
The Wikipedia web page on Comparison of X Window Managers types the numerous Window Managers right into 4 groups : Heavyweight, Middleweight, Lightweight, and also marginal. You 'd possibly want those in the marginal group.
Now, those include Matchbox, sithWM, evilwm, dwm, WMFS, wmii, and also scrotwm. (i3 obtains taken into Lightweight ; Xfwm (made use of by default in Xfce) and also Openbox (made use of by default in LXDE) are both taken into consideration Middleweight by this category.)
I do not recognize what premises were made use of to arrange these out, and also have not attempted sufficient of these to recognize just how exact it is.
Pertaining to the factor you made concerning Compiz standalone, nonetheless, I would certainly rule out that even more lightweight than making use of LXDE with Openbox or XFCE with XFWM. Compiz is a source monster ; utilizing it alone is not mosting likely to be a lot various than utilizing it under GNOME, as long as you do not load anything in GNOME you do not require.
(Remember that XFCE and also LXDE are desktop computer settings ; you can run their default window supervisors without making use of the remainder of these desktop computer settings, similar to you can run Compiz without a Desktop environment also. Well, at the very least I recognize you can run Openbox without LXDE. I've never ever attempted running XFWM without XFCE.)
Before I relocated to KDE I was a hardcore Fluxbox customer. It has command user interface fbrun that can be made use of to release programs in addition to a rightclick personalized food selection. It additionally has window tabs, I think it is just one of the first WM's to have this. IIRC Fluxbox is the WM that Damn Small Linux usages.
Did you look at a few other "lighterweight";- ) window supervisors?
I'm completly satisfied with i3 as an example : http://i3wm.org/
It's simply a tiling windowmanger with dmenu for releasing applications. No desktop computer, nothing else unique attributes and also the binary is simply some KBs.
There are a whole lot others in this array :
The absolut minimum would certainly be running your X-Server with no windowmanager and also simply with something like dmenu (http://tools.suckless.org/dmenu/ ) to release applications. I'm not exactly sure if this is actually what you desire, due to the fact that you will not have the ability to resize the application windows, relocate them, and so on