How several manufacturing web servers should I start with?

I'm constructing a website that I intend to expand to the dimension of SO.

I'm just intending to have one prodcuction server to start with. This will certainly organize every little thing consisting of the data source.

I recognize it is really tough to claim yet am I most likely to face problem promptly (if the website removes) and also if this holds true should I start with greater than one server so I can load equilibrium every little thing from day 1?

If no, should I be seeking something a little larger than this specification?: http://www.123-reg.co.uk/dedicated-server-hosting/

0
2019-05-18 23:29:10
Source Share
Answers: 2

Getting greater than one committed server for beginning a website (despite if you anticipate it to expand to dimension of SO with time) would certainly be a waste. (Consider that SO itself has actually taken years to expand to its existing dimension).

I would certainly also recommend start with a VPS (digital exclusive server). If there are also the least tip of development, you can go with committed.

You could have come across cloud computer. It exercises much better (price and also convenience of scaling) in the future for some sort of high website traffic websites yet is extra pricey (both in regards to price and also bootstrapping time) to start with it.


Could be intriguing and also also handy to you: Check out the Alexa website traffic background chart of stackoverflow: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/stackoverflow.com# (mind you these are not exact for tiny websites yet rather all right for huge websites). Most likely to Reach or TrafficRank or PageViews and also select Max in the fall food selection to see the wonderful, swiftly raising contour from 2009 to 2010. If you are actually interested, you can look into charts for some lately effective internet start-ups.

0
2019-05-21 08:36:34
Source

IMO, a manufacturing web server need to not be running Ubuntu (also the server version). I 'd directly select a scalable VPS like Rackspace or a cloud hosting carrier like Amazon EC2 so you can conveniently allocate even more sources as your demands expand or suit unanticipated abrupt website traffic spikes.

That server looks great to me, yet with no expertise of website traffic assumptions or details concerning the sort of application the website will certainly be running, that does not actually suggest much. A server like that can offer 10,000 web pages per 2nd with one application yet could just take care of 100 demands per 2nd with an additional application.

0
2019-05-21 08:30:53
Source