" Linux sustains the vibrant loading of kernel modules."
I read in a publication created by Robert Love that:
Linux sustains the vibrant loading of kernel modules.
He claimed this is the distinction in between Linux and also Unix, yet I appear to remember there is additionally KLD in FreeBSD? So can KLD additionally be viewed as vibrant loading of kernel modules?
You are not offering sufficient context, yet I believe he suggested the historic Unix execution (from the late 60s to very early 80s), which without a doubt really did not have loadable components. Linux was just one of the first unices to get loadable components, yet I assume SunOS (after that not called Solaris) existed first.