" Linux sustains the vibrant loading of kernel modules."

I read in a publication created by Robert Love that:

Linux sustains the vibrant loading of kernel modules.

He claimed this is the distinction in between Linux and also Unix, yet I appear to remember there is additionally KLD in FreeBSD? So can KLD additionally be viewed as vibrant loading of kernel modules?

0
2019-05-19 00:10:28
Source Share
Answers: 2

KLD is without a doubt vibrant kernel modules. Actually, several old-fashioned Unixen additionally have loadable kernel modules nowadays. Your publication has to be fairly old

0
2019-05-21 10:46:50
Source

You are not offering sufficient context, yet I believe he suggested the historic Unix execution (from the late 60s to very early 80s), which without a doubt really did not have loadable components. Linux was just one of the first unices to get loadable components, yet I assume SunOS (after that not called Solaris) existed first.

0
2019-05-21 10:16:58
Source